Skip to main content

Don't always blame final users if a problem occurs in industrial ventilation and dust collection systems



Three sections in this blog post:
  1. There are reasons for "lack of maintenance"
  2. Ventilation systems need to be designed to include access for cleaning and preventive maintenance
  3. One example of the benefits of easy access for maintenance

Airvate engineers have worked with customers for many years and talked with plant management and maintenance guys a lot. We understand their feelings of embarrassment which are hard to mention.

There are reasons for "lack of maintenance"

Ventilation systems often are installed and then ignored until complaints or obvious problems force attention. This neglect may be due to insufficient knowledge and motivation. 

Final users normally don't employ any professional engineer to operate and maintain these dust collection and ventilation systems, especially for small and medium-sized ones as they are "secondary".

We hear many times that inadequate or no maintenance caused problems in the systems.

I personally believe it is unfair to blame the plant management and maintenance workers. 

As design engineers, manufacturers, or service engineers, we know more about the equipment and the whole system than the final users do. A lot of things are "common sense" to us while not known by the final users, and similarly we are not familiar with their production technology and their production line. Generally speaking, one will not "touch" a thing if he/she is not familiar with or lacks knowledge about it. If the thing is still running, naturally one would leave it alone. However, most of the time after a problem develops in its early stage, the maintenance guys find out that it is not that convenient to check, inspect, or try to maintain, so inspection or maintenance is thus often delayed.

If a lifter is needed to access a piece of equipment or a section of a system, or there is no platform for maintenance attached to the equipment, it is really inconvenient. Or, if a section of duct is thought to have clogged, one normally finds out there is no inspection door or Cleanouts on it or close to it (Cleanouts were supposed to be installed at elbows and for every 10 feet of duct length).

When we do fieldwork, we always hear a "bang bang" sound, and we know somebody is trying to break up a clog by "whacking the duct or hopper with a big stick or a hammer.”

Ventilation systems need to be designed to include access for cleaning and preventive maintenance


Without such access, the exhaust volume will deteriorate. Because of access difficulties and the many demands on their time, plant managers are sometimes neglectful in performing proper preventive maintenance. 

Recommendations to management should include realistic monitoring and maintenance plans, but where possible, it is prudent to employ designs that minimize the need for diligent maintenance efforts, especially for small and medium-sized operations.

Owners of systems should always follow design and maintenance recommendations.

One example of the benefits of easy access for maintenance


Three surveys measuring system exhaust air volume were conducted in a furniture manufacturing facility in one study.
A new ventilation system was installed for the first survey, resulting in an exhaust volume of 2900 cfm. Immediately after the first survey, the gasoline-powered fan was replaced by a smaller capacity electrically powered fan. 
Deterioration in the ventilation system was seen after seven years. Problems included clogged slots, paint chips and sawdust deposits in plenums, and a loose and frayed fan belt. The second survey indicated a reduction in exhaust volume to 1060 cfm. 
With the smaller capacity fan still in place, the system was otherwise upgraded to allow for easier access and maintenance was performed. The third survey showed that the ventilation system performance was better (exhaust volume improved to 2080 cfm). 

This study showed the benefits of designing for preventive maintenance and the necessity of keeping the ventilation system clean.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What you have to know when applying blast gate damper

  Introduction A damper is a device that adjusts the volume of airflow passing through the outlet, inlet or duct. By proper adjustment of all dampers in a system, a desired distribution of airflows in all the branches can be obtained, while minimizing the total airflow of the system to save energy— this is also termed air balancing. The most common dampers used in industrial ventilation and dust collection systems to balance airflows are slide gate dampers (The slide gate, also called “blast gate or cut-off” damper). In a slide gate damper (see Figure 1 of a straight flat slide gate damper), the slide is inserted perpendicular to the flow. Figure 1 A sample of straight flat slide gate damper As the gate is sliding into the duct, it will add resistance to the airflow and consequently reduce the volume of airflow, while increasing airflows in all other branches. Withdrawing the gate has the reverse effect on that branch and all the others in a system. Interaction between a fan ...

Push-pull ventilation system for open surface tank saves air flow

  Three sections in this blog: Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Disadvantages of general ventilation and side exhaust systems Methods to design a push-pull ventilation system Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Open surface tanks used in industrial processes often need ventilating to remove harmful pollutants (vapors, fumes or aerosols) from the working environment. One method of removing pollutants is the so-called side push-pull ventilation system, in which a jet of air is blown (or pushed) from one side of the tank and collected (or pulled) by an exhaust hood on the opposite parallel side. This system is particularly useful for large tanks where access requirements preclude the use of an overhead canopy, and the size of the tank makes side (or rim) exhaust systems prohibitively expensive. Most agree that a push-pull ventilation system can yield air savings of up to 50% compared to a side suction only hood. An illustration of a push-pull system for an o...

Baghouse Dye Test for leak detection

  We did a Dye test for a customer in a newly installed baghouse. In this standard dye test procedure, green fluorescent dye powder was applied. No leaks were found in the clean plenum of the baghouse. All the bags were properly installed and no breach between the clean air and dirty air plenums was found either. View of Clean Plenum after Dye applied Per the request of our customer, we also got inside the dirty side of the baghouse through the inspection door on the hopper and visually checked dye powder distribution on the bags. From the picture below, it is apparent that the dye powder evenly distributed on all the bags, which means that the airflow was evenly distributed too. Customer was very happy about this visual check. Bottom View of Bags after Dye Applied