Skip to main content

A well-designed rain cap can reduce the pressure drop of a cyclone separator


The pressure loss of a cyclone separator is divided into three main contributions from: the cyclone inlet, cyclone body, and vortex finder (gas outlet). The gas swirl inside the cyclone body is very useful for particle separation, but as this swirl exits the cyclone through the gas outlet, the rotational energy which is stored within is actually lost. This is the main source of the pressure loss of a cyclone separator.

A lot of studies have been conducted trying to reduce the pressure loss caused by this rotational energy in the exiting gas flow through modifications on the gas outlet:

  1. Modify the length and diameter,
  2. Change its shape from cylinder-shape to cone-shape.

These modifications can indeed reduce the pressure loss, but cannot be done to existing cyclones inexpensively.

Some studies looked outside of a cyclone separator. Here are two examples.

  1. In one study, in order to minimize the cyclone’s pressure loss, a pressure recovery type diffuser known as a radial diffuser is used on top of the cyclone body connecting with the gas outlet. This diffuser converts the rotational energy of the exiting gas back into static pressure. The study showed that with this diffuser up to 30% pressure recovery is possible (without impairing the separation efficiency). After the rotation attenuates, the gas flow leaves the diffuser chamber tangentially. This diffuser is much like a scroll outlet, but with a pressure plate within it placed parallel to the cyclone top cover.
  2. Another study tested a specifically-designed rain cap on two cyclones with different inlet velocities. It is much simpler with the gap between the top and bottom parts adjustable. The test results showed that it can reduce the pressure loss by between 8.7% and 11.9%.


Demonstration of a rain cap on the top of a cyclone


sketch of a specifically-designed rain cap

When designing a rain cap  or a radial diffuser to fit on a cyclone, stresses caused by wind load and weight also require consideration.

The common practice is for the gas outlet to end just above the cyclone top, or to cover it with a shallow cone (traditional rain cap) to keep rain and snow out. Though less common, some installations have covers (called spin caps) that direct exhaust gas flow away from prevailing winds or an adjacent structure. A traditional style rain cap on a cyclone doesn’t help to recover pressure loss. Actually, it is used on any vertical gas outlet, like a stack.

To replace a traditional cap with an inexpensive, specifically-designed one will definitely save a lot of energy cost in the long run, especially for a high efficiency cyclone, which normally requires a high pressure drop.

Both radial diffusers and specifically-designed rain caps don’t influence the collection efficiency of cyclone separators as expected per the studies, since they are all installed after a cyclone.

Airvate strongly recommends,

  1. if you are installing a new cyclone, ask the supplier to use a radial diffuser if applicable; and,
  2. replace existing traditional style rain caps with specifically-designed ones.

Cyclone services by Airvate that you/ your customers can afford

Whether you are sizing a cyclone or using one now, if you need any services listed below, feel free to contact Airvate at info@airvate.com.

  1. Have to change dimensions of inlet, gas outlet, and/or dust outlet, and want to know how the changes affect cyclone performance.
  2. Need a new cyclone that has to meet the specified requirement.
  3. Need a new cyclone with the best available performance in a limited space.
  4.  Want to avoid or reduce the wear-out or blockage that always happens to your cyclone.
  5. Want to reuse an existing cyclone and know its performance in a new process.
  6. Want to optimize the performance of an existing low-efficiency cyclone.
  7. The existing cyclone collection efficiency is too high for the process and you want to lower it.
  8. The existing cyclone has either too high or too low of a pressure drop
  9.  Want to optimize the performance or solve any problem of the combo of an existing cyclone (as a pre-cleaner) and a baghouse.
  10.  Want to solve the uneven dust distribution problem in applications of dual-cyclone, quad-cyclone, or multi-barrel cyclone; with this issue, one or two cyclone barrels get more dust, and consequently, it causes wear-out in their inlet section and cone bottom more quickly than on others.
  11. Existing cyclones in series don’t work as expected.

Keyword:

Rain cap, cyclone separator, pressure loss, pressure drop, static pressure, radial diffuser, vortex finder, gas outlet

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Industrial Manuals, Standards and Codes I’ve Consulted

  When doing calculations, designing, and/or on-site work, we have to figure out which standard and code (federal, state, local) we will follow.   EPA and Permits EPA Title V Operating Permits (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Rule 6X for metalworking operations (EPA) Method 22: visual determination of fugitive emissions from material sources (EPA) Method 9: Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards)  On-site Measurement OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) Section II: Chapter 3, on-site Measurement (EPA) Method 22: visual determination of fugitive emissions from material sources (EPA) Method 9: Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources Airborne Contaminants Cal/OSHA Title 8 Section 5155 - Airborne Contaminants OSHA (CFR, Title 29,1910) and Subpart Z - Toxic and Hazardous Substances OSHA 3348-05: Guidance for the Identification and...

Why and How to do Air Balancing on Industrial Ventilation and Dust Collection Systems?

  Introduction The performances of all the hoods in the whole system normally decide the success of industrial ventilation and dust collection systems from the point of a system owner’s view. The appropriate hood design and its needed airflow rate require the application of good ventilation practice, mastery of the technical knowledge and the ability and patience to do the mathematical calculations. When more than one hood is connected to one ventilation system, the design engineer has to assure that each hood can and will receive the volume of airflow equal or above its designed value and the whole system operates with the minimum possible airflow rate to save energy. This task is termed air balancing of the system or duct balancing. Unbalanced systems cause problems On the contrary, examine the case where one or more hoods are unable to receive desired volume of airflow from an unbalanced ventilation system. It is not uncommon that many hoods are receiving airflow volumes...

Push-pull ventilation system for open surface tank saves air flow

  Three sections in this blog: Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Disadvantages of general ventilation and side exhaust systems Methods to design a push-pull ventilation system Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Open surface tanks used in industrial processes often need ventilating to remove harmful pollutants (vapors, fumes or aerosols) from the working environment. One method of removing pollutants is the so-called side push-pull ventilation system, in which a jet of air is blown (or pushed) from one side of the tank and collected (or pulled) by an exhaust hood on the opposite parallel side. This system is particularly useful for large tanks where access requirements preclude the use of an overhead canopy, and the size of the tank makes side (or rim) exhaust systems prohibitively expensive. Most agree that a push-pull ventilation system can yield air savings of up to 50% compared to a side suction only hood. An illustration of a push-pull system for an o...