Skip to main content

The relationship between the arithmetic mean and quadratic mean for particle size distribution

 


Introduction

Particle size distribution data of a material to be collected is very important for the selection and sizing of a dust collector.

If a population of particles is represented by a single number (or mean), there can be many different measures of mean sizes (or central tendency): arithmetic, geometric, quadratic, cubic, biquadratic, and harmonic to name just a few, each appropriate to specific uses.

The mean particle size is rarely quoted in isolation: it is usually related to some application and used as a single number to represent the full size distribution. It represents the distribution by some property which is vital to the application or process under study; if two size distributions have the same mean, the two materials are likely to behave in the process in the same way.

The arithmetic mean

The arithmetic mean is the measure of central tendency most widely used in general statistics, and is essential to a few procedures (such as defining a normal probability distribution). In the precipitation of fine particles due to turbulence, the most relevant mean size is the arithmetic mean of the mass distribution.

The quadratic mean

The relaxation time and terminal velocity of a particle are both proportional to squared particle size. Most procedures in dynamic separation do not specifically require the use of the arithmetic mean. For example, in prediction of the total efficiency of settling chambers, cyclone separator, or other dynamic separators, quadratic means of the mass distribution is most appropriate.

The relationship between them

Usage of the phrase "average particle diameter" has often been very loose, and unwary readers often take it to mean the arithmetic mean, when in fact the value given is the quadratic mean. It is therefore good practice to be specific. The quadratic mean gives greater weight to bigger particles and is equal to or greater than the arithmetic mean by an amount that depends on the variance (s2) according to the relationship below:

(QMD)2 = <x>2 + s2

Where, QMD is Quadratic Mean Diameter,

<x> is arithmetic mean diameter and,

s is the spread of particle diameters distribution.

Normally, when <x> and s are presented in a particle size distribution report, the above expression can be used and obtain the quadratic mean easily and conveniently.

Two examples of particle size distribution

Here are two particle size distribution examples; the difference between the two means is clear.

Example 1 is milled corn; the arithmetic mean diameter is 839.27 micron, while the quadratic mean is 1041.38 micron. The spread of the distribution is 616.64. 

Particle diameter (micron)

Percentage of mass (%)

53

0.10%

73

0.91%

103

3.24%

150

3.44%

212

6.67%

297

8.09%

420

11.73%

594

15.17%

841

18.20%

1191

19.62%

1680

7.99%

2380

3.24%

3360

1.62%

Example 2 is the particle size distribution of sand; the arithmetic mean diameter is 102.83 micron, while the quadratic mean is 116.5 micron. The spread of the distribution is 54.75.

Particle diameter (micron)

Percentage of mass

10

5.50%

53

2.70%

63

5.60%

75

28.40%

106

23.30%

125

20.00%

150

12.00%

210

0.40%

250

0.50%

300

0.90%

420

0.40%

500

0.20%

850

0.10%

 Summary

The difference between the arithmetic mean and quadratic mean determines their different usages. However, if the variance of the particle size distribution is given, quadratic mean is conveniently available from their simple relationship.

In any case, users should be conscious of the difference between quadratic and arithmetic mean diameters (which usually is not large) and be specific in defining the value used.

In stands with small diameters and narrow range in diameters, the differences are slight between arithmetic mean and quadratic mean diameters. In stands with large diameters and a wide range of diameters present or with strongly skewed diameter distributions, the differences can be substantial.

Keyword

Particle size, mean particle size, Particle size distribution, arithmetic mean diameter (size), quadratic mean diameter (size), dynamic separator, settling chamber, cyclone separator

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What you have to know when applying blast gate damper

  Introduction A damper is a device that adjusts the volume of airflow passing through the outlet, inlet or duct. By proper adjustment of all dampers in a system, a desired distribution of airflows in all the branches can be obtained, while minimizing the total airflow of the system to save energy— this is also termed air balancing. The most common dampers used in industrial ventilation and dust collection systems to balance airflows are slide gate dampers (The slide gate, also called “blast gate or cut-off” damper). In a slide gate damper (see Figure 1 of a straight flat slide gate damper), the slide is inserted perpendicular to the flow. Figure 1 A sample of straight flat slide gate damper As the gate is sliding into the duct, it will add resistance to the airflow and consequently reduce the volume of airflow, while increasing airflows in all other branches. Withdrawing the gate has the reverse effect on that branch and all the others in a system. Interaction between a fan ...

Industrial Manuals, Standards and Codes I’ve Consulted

  When doing calculations, designing, and/or on-site work, we have to figure out which standard and code (federal, state, local) we will follow.   EPA and Permits EPA Title V Operating Permits (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Rule 6X for metalworking operations (EPA) Method 22: visual determination of fugitive emissions from material sources (EPA) Method 9: Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards)  On-site Measurement OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) Section II: Chapter 3, on-site Measurement (EPA) Method 22: visual determination of fugitive emissions from material sources (EPA) Method 9: Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources Airborne Contaminants Cal/OSHA Title 8 Section 5155 - Airborne Contaminants OSHA (CFR, Title 29,1910) and Subpart Z - Toxic and Hazardous Substances OSHA 3348-05: Guidance for the Identification and...

Push-pull ventilation system for open surface tank saves air flow

  Three sections in this blog: Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Disadvantages of general ventilation and side exhaust systems Methods to design a push-pull ventilation system Push-pull ventilation system and its advantages Open surface tanks used in industrial processes often need ventilating to remove harmful pollutants (vapors, fumes or aerosols) from the working environment. One method of removing pollutants is the so-called side push-pull ventilation system, in which a jet of air is blown (or pushed) from one side of the tank and collected (or pulled) by an exhaust hood on the opposite parallel side. This system is particularly useful for large tanks where access requirements preclude the use of an overhead canopy, and the size of the tank makes side (or rim) exhaust systems prohibitively expensive. Most agree that a push-pull ventilation system can yield air savings of up to 50% compared to a side suction only hood. An illustration of a push-pull system for an o...